by
Richard Herz
&
Lorraine Leete
Responding to M. Anderson Berry, Whether Foreigner or Alien: A New Look at the Original Language of the Alien Tort Statute, 27 Berkeley J. of Int’l. L. 316 (2009).*
[ PDF version ] [ Go to comments ]
Introduction
The Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”) grants federal district courts jurisdiction over claims by an “alien” for torts committed in violation of the law of nations.[1] The statute was enacted in 1789 as part of the First Judiciary Act.[2] Since 1980, when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided Filartiga v. Pena-Irala,[3] the law has been used by victims of egregious human rights abuses to seek redress from the officials who committed or commanded those who committed such abuses.[4] More recently, victims have filed ATS suits against corporations alleged to be complicit in horrific human rights violations.[5] Many, if not most, ATS cases have been filed by non-resident aliens harmed in their home countries.[6]